原(yuan)標題：被執行人抖(dou)音平臺(tai)發布不實言論 嘉峪關市城區法院(yuan)通報案情澄清事實

　　中(zhong)國甘肅(su)網8月23日訊(xun) 據蘭州晨報(bao)報(bao)道（掌上蘭(lan)州(zhou)·蘭(lan)州(zhou)晨報記者(zhe)姚(yao)智）8月15日，嘉峪關居民嚴偉通過(guo)抖音平臺舉報嘉峪關市城區人民法(fa)(fa)(fa)院干(gan)警在執(zhi)法(fa)(fa)(fa)辦案過(guo)程中(zhong)剝(bo)奪其質證(zheng)、辯論(lun)權(quan)利，枉法(fa)(fa)(fa)裁判(pan)、違法(fa)(fa)(fa)執(zhi)行，該不實(shi)言論(lun)造成了惡劣影(ying)響。為澄清事實(shi)，以正視聽，嘉峪關市城區法(fa)(fa)(fa)院黨(dang)組于(yu)8月16日就案件的相關事實(shi)對外公開進行了通報。

　　嘉峪關(guan)市城(cheng)區法院(yuan)(yuan)于2019年審(shen)理了(le)中(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)國工商銀行股份有限公(gong)司嘉峪關(guan)分行訴(su)嚴偉、置地陽光房(fang)地產(chan)公(gong)司的金融借款合同(tong)糾紛案。該案宣判后，被告(gao)嚴偉并未在上訴(su)期內提起上訴(su)，該判決現已生(sheng)效。進入執行程序(xu)后，嚴偉向嘉峪關(guan)市中(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)級(ji)人民法院(yuan)(yuan)申請再審(shen)。市中(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)級(ji)人民法院(yuan)(yuan)審(shen)查后，認為嚴偉的再審(shen)申請理由不(bu)成立，駁回其再審(shen)申請。

　　判(pan)(pan)決生效(xiao)后，保(bao)證人(ren)(ren)(ren)置(zhi)地(di)(di)陽(yang)光房地(di)(di)產(chan)公司(si)代(dai)償(chang)了房屋貸款本金、律(lv)(lv)師(shi)費(fei)(fei)、訴訟(song)費(fei)(fei)等(deng)284621.67元及占用(yong)(yong)期(qi)間(jian)的利息后，向(xiang)市城區法(fa)(fa)院(yuan)申(shen)(shen)(shen)請(qing)(qing)(qing)(qing)強制執(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)行(xing)(xing)(xing)嚴(yan)(yan)偉(wei)(wei)，要求被(bei)執(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)行(xing)(xing)(xing)人(ren)(ren)(ren)嚴(yan)(yan)偉(wei)(wei)償(chang)還為(wei)其(qi)代(dai)償(chang)的房屋貸款本金、占用(yong)(yong)期(qi)間(jian)的利息、訴訟(song)費(fei)(fei)、執(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)行(xing)(xing)(xing)費(fei)(fei)、律(lv)(lv)師(shi)費(fei)(fei)等(deng)296747元。執(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)行(xing)(xing)(xing)過程(cheng)中(zhong)，經執(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)行(xing)(xing)(xing)法(fa)(fa)官核(he)實，申(shen)(shen)(shen)請(qing)(qing)(qing)(qing)人(ren)(ren)(ren)稱申(shen)(shen)(shen)請(qing)(qing)(qing)(qing)金額(e)有誤，將申(shen)(shen)(shen)請(qing)(qing)(qing)(qing)金額(e)變更(geng)為(wei)197179.15元，并(bing)經申(shen)(shen)(shen)請(qing)(qing)(qing)(qing)人(ren)(ren)(ren)簽字、捺印(yin)確(que)(que)認。嚴(yan)(yan)偉(wei)(wei)認為(wei)其(qi)不(bu)應(ying)承擔(dan)律(lv)(lv)師(shi)費(fei)(fei)、訴訟(song)費(fei)(fei)用(yong)(yong)等(deng)，執(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)行(xing)(xing)(xing)法(fa)(fa)官向(xiang)其(qi)釋明(ming)執(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)行(xing)(xing)(xing)數額(e)應(ying)當按(an)照判(pan)(pan)決書確(que)(que)定的內容和(he)數額(e)予(yu)以(yi)執(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)行(xing)(xing)(xing)，或者與申(shen)(shen)(shen)請(qing)(qing)(qing)(qing)人(ren)(ren)(ren)溝通達成執(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)行(xing)(xing)(xing)和(he)解，方可就(jiu)生效(xiao)法(fa)(fa)律(lv)(lv)文書確(que)(que)定的數額(e)進行(xing)(xing)(xing)減免變更(geng)。執(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)行(xing)(xing)(xing)過程(cheng)中(zhong)，嚴(yan)(yan)偉(wei)(wei)對生效(xiao)判(pan)(pan)決申(shen)(shen)(shen)請(qing)(qing)(qing)(qing)再(zai)審，執(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)行(xing)(xing)(xing)法(fa)(fa)官與申(shen)(shen)(shen)請(qing)(qing)(qing)(qing)執(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)行(xing)(xing)(xing)人(ren)(ren)(ren)協調并(bing)電話告知嚴(yan)(yan)偉(wei)(wei)后于2021年5月31日終(zhong)結(jie)執(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)行(xing)(xing)(xing)該(gai)案(an)。8月6日，申(shen)(shen)(shen)請(qing)(qing)(qing)(qing)人(ren)(ren)(ren)置(zhi)地(di)(di)陽(yang)光房地(di)(di)產(chan)公司(si)以(yi)嚴(yan)(yan)偉(wei)(wei)再(zai)審申(shen)(shen)(shen)請(qing)(qing)(qing)(qing)已被(bei)駁(bo)回為(wei)由申(shen)(shen)(shen)請(qing)(qing)(qing)(qing)恢(hui)復執(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)行(xing)(xing)(xing)。8月9日，該(gai)案(an)恢(hui)復執(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)行(xing)(xing)(xing)，法(fa)(fa)院(yuan)向(xiang)嚴(yan)(yan)偉(wei)(wei)發出執(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)行(xing)(xing)(xing)通知書和(he)報告財產(chan)令，要求嚴(yan)(yan)偉(wei)(wei)3日內履行(xing)(xing)(xing)判(pan)(pan)決書確(que)(que)定的義務，但(dan)嚴(yan)(yan)偉(wei)(wei)至今未履行(xing)(xing)(xing)。在案(an)件恢(hui)復執(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)行(xing)(xing)(xing)期(qi)間(jian)，執(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)行(xing)(xing)(xing)法(fa)(fa)官多次通知雙方當事人(ren)(ren)(ren)到庭(ting)進行(xing)(xing)(xing)協商，申(shen)(shen)(shen)請(qing)(qing)(qing)(qing)人(ren)(ren)(ren)表示可放棄全部利息、部分律(lv)(lv)師(shi)代(dai)理費(fei)(fei)用(yong)(yong)、訴訟(song)、執(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)行(xing)(xing)(xing)費(fei)(fei)用(yong)(yong)。嚴(yan)(yan)偉(wei)(wei)表示不(bu)愿承擔(dan)因房屋貸款糾紛產(chan)生的訴訟(song)費(fei)(fei)、執(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)行(xing)(xing)(xing)費(fei)(fei)、律(lv)(lv)師(shi)費(fei)(fei)及利息，只同意(yi)在申(shen)(shen)(shen)請(qing)(qing)(qing)(qing)人(ren)(ren)(ren)置(zhi)地(di)(di)陽(yang)光房地(di)(di)產(chan)公司(si)代(dai)償(chang)的本金范(fan)圍內每月償(chang)還1380元，至付清為(wei)止，也(ye)不(bu)愿意(yi)評估拍賣其(qi)名下房屋。

　　對(dui)于(yu)(yu)嚴(yan)偉(wei)(wei)反(fan)映(ying)(ying)的(de)承辦(ban)法(fa)官(guan)中(zhong)途離(li)庭及(ji)剝奪其(qi)(qi)舉證(zheng)(zheng)、質證(zheng)(zheng)、辯(bian)(bian)論權利問(wen)題(ti)(ti)(ti)，經核(he)查(cha)不(bu)存在承辦(ban)法(fa)官(guan)中(zhong)途離(li)庭情況。嚴(yan)偉(wei)(wei)到庭參加了(le)訴訟，對(dui)原告提(ti)交(jiao)的(de)證(zheng)(zheng)據充(chong)分發表了(le)質證(zheng)(zheng)意見，對(dui)原告提(ti)交(jiao)的(de)證(zheng)(zheng)據均予認可，也沒有(you)(you)(you)提(ti)交(jiao)證(zheng)(zheng)據，不(bu)存在法(fa)官(guan)不(bu)讓其(qi)(qi)提(ti)交(jiao)證(zheng)(zheng)據問(wen)題(ti)(ti)(ti)。法(fa)庭調查(cha)終(zhong)結(jie)后(hou)，法(fa)官(guan)充(chong)分保(bao)證(zheng)(zheng)了(le)雙方的(de)辯(bian)(bian)論權利，嚴(yan)偉(wei)(wei)表示沒有(you)(you)(you)新的(de)辯(bian)(bian)論意見。對(dui)于(yu)(yu)嚴(yan)偉(wei)(wei)反(fan)映(ying)(ying)的(de)其(qi)(qi)到庭參加訴訟，但判(pan)(pan)決書中(zhong)引用了(le)《中(zhong)華人民共(gong)和國民事訴訟法(fa)》第一(yi)百四十四條規定的(de)問(wen)題(ti)(ti)(ti)，經查(cha)，該問(wen)題(ti)(ti)(ti)系(xi)筆誤(wu)，現已進(jin)(jin)行(xing)更正。對(dui)于(yu)(yu)嚴(yan)偉(wei)(wei)反(fan)映(ying)(ying)的(de)執(zhi)(zhi)行(xing)過程中(zhong)存在的(de)問(wen)題(ti)(ti)(ti)，本案申(shen)請(qing)金額(e)的(de)變(bian)動(dong)，系(xi)申(shen)請(qing)人申(shen)請(qing)錯誤(wu)，經執(zhi)(zhi)行(xing)法(fa)官(guan)核(he)實(shi)后(hou)改(gai)動(dong)，并(bing)經申(shen)請(qing)人簽字、捺印確認。嚴(yan)偉(wei)(wei)在判(pan)(pan)決生效且其(qi)(qi)再審申(shen)請(qing)被駁回后(hou)為規避執(zhi)(zhi)行(xing)多次向(xiang)有(you)(you)(you)關部門信訪(fang)，嘉峪關市城區法(fa)院(yuan)已多次向(xiang)其(qi)(qi)進(jin)(jin)行(xing)過答復，但其(qi)(qi)不(bu)但不(bu)依(yi)法(fa)履行(xing)生效判(pan)(pan)決，反(fan)而持續(xu)信訪(fang)，甚(shen)至(zhi)發布(bu)不(bu)實(shi)視頻擾亂(luan)視聽。

　　經審(shen)查，嘉峪關(guan)市(shi)城區法(fa)院審(shen)理(li)、執(zhi)行本案過程中不(bu)(bu)存在違法(fa)審(shen)理(li)、執(zhi)行的(de)(de)問題，但(dan)審(shen)判執(zhi)行工作還有不(bu)(bu)夠嚴(yan)謹、細致、規范的(de)(de)地(di)方(fang)。下一步，市(shi)城區法(fa)院將嚴(yan)格按(an)照(zhao)法(fa)律規定(ding)執(zhi)行本案，對嚴(yan)偉的(de)(de)違法(fa)行為進行處理(li)。