AI寫稿也有著作權

　　近年，人工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)智能技(ji)術逐漸應用于新(xin)聞寫作(zuo)(zuo)、繪(hui)畫、詩歌寫作(zuo)(zuo)等諸多領域(yu)，有關(guan)(guan)人工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)智能生成(cheng)(cheng)物的著作(zuo)(zuo)權問題也一直困擾著學(xue)界和實(shi)務界。如何判斷(duan)人工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)智能生成(cheng)(cheng)物的獨創(chuang)性(xing)？怎么看待人工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)智能生成(cheng)(cheng)物的創(chuang)作(zuo)(zuo)過(guo)程？相(xiang)關(guan)(guan)人工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)智能使用人員的行為能否(fou)(fou)被認定為法律(lv)意義上的創(chuang)作(zuo)(zuo)行為？人工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)智能生成(cheng)(cheng)物是(shi)否(fou)(fou)屬于具有著作(zuo)(zuo)權的作(zuo)(zuo)品？人工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)智能生成(cheng)(cheng)物的著作(zuo)(zuo)權是(shi)否(fou)(fou)應該得到保護？

　　人(ren)工智(zhi)能作品(pin)雖(sui)是(shi)經由(you)智(zhi)能軟件(jian)在技術上生(sheng)成而來的，但整體(ti)上體(ti)現了背后主(zhu)創(chuang)團隊人(ren)員的個(ge)性化安排(pai)、標(biao)準選擇以及(ji)表(biao)達意圖(tu)，其間(jian)具有一定的獨創(chuang)性，這(zhe)部分同(tong)樣應(ying)該得(de)到人(ren)們應(ying)有的尊重和法律的保(bao)護。此次案件(jian)對(dui)今(jin)后同(tong)類型案件(jian)的審(shen)理(li)有一定的借鑒(jian)意義，也對(dui)今(jin)后如(ru)何看(kan)待(dai)人(ren)工智(zhi)能作品(pin)具有啟示意義。

　　隨著(zhu)(zhu)人工(gong)(gong)智(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)能(neng)(neng)技術在(zai)當下社會更廣范圍內(nei)的(de)(de)應(ying)用(yong)(yong)，著(zhu)(zhu)作權(quan)保(bao)護范疇(chou)應(ying)該從自然人創(chuang)作向人工(gong)(gong)智(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)能(neng)(neng)作品延伸，并就相(xiang)關(guan)細節作出及時(shi)調整與修訂，從而更好(hao)地適應(ying)互聯網(wang)信(xin)息技術時(shi)代可能(neng)(neng)出現的(de)(de)新情況新要(yao)求。將文學(xue)、藝術和科學(xue)領域內(nei)具備獨(du)創(chuang)性(xing)的(de)(de)人工(gong)(gong)智(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)能(neng)(neng)生(sheng)成物(wu)認定為作品并進(jin)行著(zhu)(zhu)作權(quan)保(bao)護，符合著(zhu)(zhu)作權(quan)法激(ji)勵創(chuang)作的(de)(de)立法宗旨，有利于(yu)激(ji)勵人們主(zhu)動利用(yong)(yong)人工(gong)(gong)智(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)能(neng)(neng)進(jin)行創(chuang)作，也有益(yi)于(yu)人工(gong)(gong)智(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)能(neng)(neng)產(chan)業的(de)(de)良(liang)性(xing)發展。

　　快速發(fa)展的互聯網使(shi)得人(ren)們的信息(xi)表達及書寫形式日(ri)漸多樣化(hua)、智能(neng)化(hua)，然而互聯網并非“法外(wai)之地(di)”，一旦侵(qin)權行為發(fa)生(sheng)，就(jiu)須(xu)承擔相(xiang)應的侵(qin)權責(ze)任(ren)，在(zai)這種情(qing)形之下，人(ren)們日(ri)常的“觸(chu)網”行為更(geng)需要(yao)加強(qiang)自律(lv)。